A large amount of wastewater from textile industries, containing dyes enter into water bodies as effulents. These dyes are hazardous to biotic as well as abiotic life. Some of these dyes are Congo red dye, Azo dyes, Methylene blue dyes. [1] Generally, such dyes are classified into cationic, anionic and nonionic dyes. [2][3] The anionic type of dyes i.e. Azo dyes are toxic to human health and causes irritation to eyes, skin and respiratory tract. Azo dyes also causes water borne diseases. Conventional treatment methods such as biological oxidation, coagulation, and membrane filtration often fail to achieve satisfactory dye removal. Adsorption is an eco-friendly process. Kaolin-supported metal oxide composites have high surface area, active sites for dye binding, and improved stability, positioning them as efficient adsorbents. Kaolin posseses very low reactive surface. It has very less adsorption sites. When Kaolin is treated with metal oxide it overcomes it characterstic limitations. 

Materials Materials required for synthesis of Kaolin-metal oxide composite are as follows Natural Kaolin clay, Metal precursors e.g., FeCl₃, TiCl₄, Zn(NO₃)₂),, reducing agents (e.g., NaBH₄ for nanoparticles) [5], solvents (deionised water, ethanol)

Synthesis Routes :

Several synthesis methods reported in the literature include:

1. Co-precipitation :

In this method, metal salts are mixed with kaolin clay suspension (Zn-Kaolin via co-precipitation method) [6]. Kaolin-Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles is effective adsorbent for removal of methylene blue dyes from wastewater.[7]

The co-precipitation method for synthesizing kaolin-metal composites offers a low-cost, simple, and efficient one-pot technique for producing highly uniform Nano-powders with enhanced specific surface areas and improved stability. It is particularly effective for creating active adsorbent materials by facilitating uniform distribution of nanoparticles, which increases reactivity and enhances removal efficiency for water treatment and environmental remediation [8][9]. This method is simple and cost-effective.

1. Sol-gel Method : 

In this method Kaolin-metal oxide nanocomposites were studied at different firing temperatures, with soaking time of 30 min to 60 min and at different zeolite concentrations, such as 0%, 10%, 20%, etc. Kaolin-metal oxide nanocomposites thus prepared were functionalized with carboxylic acid group to increase adsorption area. Further it was used for removal of acid fuschin dye and methylene blue dye.[10] Sol-gel synthesis of kaolin-metal composites (such as TiO₂ or Zn) leads to high photocatalytic activity and superior antimicrobial efficacy. In this method, metal alkoxides or salts hydrolyse onto kaolin, yielding uniform dispersion on the surface [12]. Kaolin was also encorporated with Titanium propoxide which was used for removal of methylene blue and methyl orange II dyes. In this way these nanocomposites prepared by sol-gel method were used for removal of tannery wastewater. [13][14]

1.  Solvothermal Method :

In this method kaolinite was kept in an organic medium such as tetrapropylammonium ion.[15][16][17][18]. Here it was observed that crystal growth was influenced when different parameters such as temperature, soaking time were changed.[19] To remove impurities acid treatment was done.[20] Heat and pressure promote crystalline growth of metal oxides on kaolin, improving structural stability.

2. Wet Impregnation Method :

Recently, researchers have prepared Kaolin-nickel oxide nanocomposite using Wet-impregnation method. The catalytic activity of prepared nanocomposites were studied at variable temperature, amount of oxidant. Wet-impregnation method was used for good dispersion of active phase in dye removal process. Using this malachite green dye was removed. In this method Kaolin was washed thoroughly with distilled water. Then it was dried at 100 degree Celsius. Then precursor dissolved in water was added to it. NaOH was added to it for complete precipitation. The mixture was stirred  and sand bath treatment was done. Then the sample was dried and calcined. Like this different samples were prepared with varying metal oxide concentration.[22] Also CuO – Kaolin nanocomposites were prepared using wet impregnation method. Its performance was studied at differentr concentrations of Kaolin and CuO catalyst.[23] In this method, kaolin is soaked in metal precursor solution, followed by calcination to form metal oxide

Results

  Structural Properties –

Kaolin altered with metal oxides shows significantly increased surface area and pore volume compared with raw clay alone. Metal oxide nanostructures are uniformly dispersed with an increase in accessible adsorption sites. X-ray diffraction analysis reported in several studies confirms that the characteristic reflections of kaolinite at 2θ ≈ 12.3° and 24.9°, corresponding to the (001) and (002) planes, are preserved after metal modification, indicating that the fundamental layered structure of kaolin remains intact. Additional diffraction peaks corresponding to metal oxides such as

Fe₂O₃, ZnO, CuO, and NiO confirm the successful incorporation of metal species onto the

kaolin. Light peak broadening and intensity variations are observed, which show nanoscale metal oxide dispersion and partial interlayer interaction without structural modification.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy further supports these findings. Shifts and intensity reductions in hydroxyl bands indicate coordination or hydrogen bonding between metal ions and surface –OH groups. Scanning electron microscopy images consistently show that raw kaolin possesses plate-like, stacked morphology, whereas metal-modified kaolin composites display rougher and more heterogeneous surfaces due to the deposition of metal oxide nanoparticles. Uniform nanoparticle dispersion enhances surface heterogeneity and active adsorption sites, while excessive metal loading can lead to particle agglomeration, potentially reducing adsorption efficiency.

Reported values show an increase from approximately 10–20 m²/g for raw kaolin to 40–80 m²/g for metal-modified composites, with pore size distribution shifting toward the mesoporous range (2–50 nm), favourable for dye diffusion and adsorption. Mixed metal oxide systems, such as Fe–Zn loaded kaolin, further enhance pore structure and interlayer spacing, leading to improved adsorption behavior.

Overall, structural characterisation confirms that kaolin serves as a stable support for metal oxides, providing enhanced surface area, modified surface chemistry, and improved porosity. These synergistic structural features are directly responsible for the superior dye removal performance of kaolin–metal composites compared to pristine kaolin.

Adsorption Performance :

Compared to pristine kaolin, metal-modified composites exhibit superior adsorption performance due to enhanced surface area, modified surface charge, and the presence of reactive metal oxide sites [39][40].

Electrostatic Interactions :

Electrostatic interactions controls dye adsorption of these nanocomposites. Incorporation of metal oxide alters adsorptive behavior. Hence under acidic conditions anionic dyes were adsorbed and under alkaline conditions cationic dyes were adsorbed. [41][42][43].

Several studies have demonstrated that adsorption efficiency increases significantly when electrostatic attraction dominates the interaction between dye molecules and composite surfaces [44].

Surface Complexation and Coordination :

Surface complexation plays a crucial role in metal-modified kaolin systems. Metal oxides such as Fe₂O₃, ZnO, CuO, and NiO act as Lewis acid sites and form coordination bonds with functional groups of dyes, including –SO₃⁻, –NH₂, –OH, and –COOH [45][46]. These inner-sphere complexes contribute to strong and stable adsorption, explaining the higher adsorption capacities observed for kaolin–metal composites compared to raw kaolin [47].

      Hydrogen Bonding :

 Hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl group of kaolin, metal oxide and electronegative atoms in dye molecules enhance adsorptive performance. [48] FT-IR spectral

shifts after adsorption provide evidence of hydrogen bond formation, particularly in dyes containing amine and sulfonate groups [49].

π–π Interactions :

It contributes to improved adsorption in aromatic compounds. Van-der waals interactions support adsorption at higher dye concentrations. [50][51]

Pore Diffusion and Kinetic Behaviour:

 Metal encorporation onto Kaolin enhances mesoporosity.[52] 

Synergistic Effect of Metal Oxides : 

Mixed metal oxide-modified kaolin composites provide synergistic adsorption effects by offering multiple binding sites and improved surface heterogeneity. Such systems often demonstrate enhanced adsorption capacity, faster kinetics, and better regeneration performance, highlighting their potential for practical wastewater treatment applications [53].

Effect of temperature and pH :

     The low pH favours anionic dye adsorption as the surface of adsorbent becomes protonated. Hence there is increase in positive sites. So, here anioinic dye adsorption occurs here due to electrostatic attraction.[54][55][56]. At higher pH, surface deprotonation results in more negative sites, which enhances cationic dye adsorption (e.g., methylene blue, crystal violet) [57][58].

 For example in case of removal of methylene blue dye coulombic interactions increases when pH is   increases beyond 7.. Because of these effects, optimising pH is crucial for maximising dye removal efficiency. Adsorption capacity generally increases with pH for cationic dyes due to negative surface charge.

 Effect of Temperature: Temperature influences dye adsorption by affecting kinetics, thermodynamics, and molecular diffusion. The effect of temperature on adsorption is typically explained through thermodynamic parameters:

 In exothermic adsorption processes, adsorption capacity decreases with increasing temperature because heat release favours lower thermal conditions, and the strength of physical adsorption interactions weakens at higher temperatures [61][62].

In endothermic processes, adsorption capacity increases with temperature, often associated with chemisorption or systems where energy barriers must be overcome for dye molecules to interact with active sites [63][64].

Several studies confirm these trends. For example, methylene blue adsorption on modified clay adsorbents reduced as temperature increased from 30 °C to 60 °C, indicating an exothermic process. Conversely, some composites showed improved dye uptake at higher temperatures due to enhanced mobility and accessibility of dye molecules to interior pores [65][66]. These temperature effects influence the Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy values of adsorption systems, which further clarify whether the process is spontaneous or endothermic/exothermic [67][68][69]. In general, understanding temperature dependence is vital for effective application of kaolin–metal composites in real wastewater treatment scenarios where temperature conditions may vary. Temperature impacts kinetics, but most adsorption is favourable at ambient conditions.[70]

Discussion:

Dye removal occurs through hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions, Electrostatic attraction (charged dye interacts with oppositely charged surface), hydrogen bonding, Pore filling and physical adsorption. Metal oxides enhance adsorption by Providing active sites, Increasing total surface area, Improving interaction with dye molecules. Unmodified kaolin is a good adsorbent for removal of dyes pollutants from aquatic system. Unmodified (raw) kaolin has been extensively studied affordable and naturally abundant

dyes pollutants aqueous systems [71][72]. Its adsorption ability arises mainly from its layered aluminosilicate structure, surface hydroxyl groups, and moderate ion-exchange capacity. Raw kaolin shows limited adsorption capability.[73][74] Raw kaolin typically exhibits a surface area in the range of 10–20 m² g⁻¹, which restricts dye diffusion and surface interaction [75][76][77]. Various studies have shown that chemical or metal modification of kaolin significantly enhances surface area and pore volume due to structural modification [78][79]. Acid-treated or metal-oxide-loaded kaolin develops mesoporous characteristics, leading to improved dye accessibility and higher adsorption efficiency compared to unmodified kaolin. The modified kaolin exhibits additional Lewis acid sites, surface defects, and metal–oxygen functional groups that promote stronger adsorption mechanisms such as surface complexation and coordination bonding [80]. These enhanced interactions result in significantly higher adsorption capacities than those of raw kaolin [81][82].  

• pH Responsiveness and Surface Charge Behaviour:

Unmodified kaolin shows limited pH-dependent adsorption behaviour due to its relatively fixed surface charge characteristics.[83] Metal- or chemically modified kaolin displays a shifted point of zero charge, allowing better control over electrostatic interactions with both cationic and anionic dyes across a wider pH range [84]. This improved pH sensitivity is a key advantage of modified kaolin in real wastewater treatment applications [85].

• Adsorption Capacity and Kinetics :

Comparative studies consistently report that modified kaolin adsorbents exhibit 2–5 times higher dye adsorption capacity than raw kaolin. While adsorption on unmodified kaolin often follows slower pseudo-first-order kinetics dominated by physical adsorption, modified kaolin systems typically obey pseudo-second-order kinetic models, indicating the dominance of chemisorption processes. [86] Kaolin alone shows modest dye uptake (<20 mg/g), while composites often exceed 80 mg/g, highlighting the importance of metal oxide addition.

• Stability and Reusability :

Although raw kaolin is thermally stable, it often suffers from poor regeneration efficiency and reduced adsorption capacity after repeated cycles. Modified kaolin composites demonstrate enhanced structural stability and reusability due to stronger dye–adsorbent interactions and reinforced surface structure, maintaining adsorption efficiency over multiple adsorption–desorption cycles.

• Overall Performance Comparison :

Overall, while unmodified kaolin remains an economical and environmentally benign adsorbent, its adsorption performance is relatively modest. Modification through metal loading or chemical treatment transforms kaolin into a high-performance adsorbent with improved surface area, porosity, surface chemistry, adsorption capacity, and operational flexibility. Consequently, modified kaolin composites are more suitable than raw kaolin for efficient and sustainable dye removal from wastewater systems.

Future Scope and Challenges :

Kaolin –metal nanocomposite are sustainable catalysts also are very efficient dye adsorption, wastewater remediation. However some challenges are needed to be addressed such as nanoparticle agglomeration.   Developing  sustainable catalysts is important. Because after  multiple operational cycles its adsorptive efficiency decreases. The leaching of nanoparticles into aquatic environment during operation is another concern.  Further more eco-friendly techniques could be invented for preparation of these nanocomposites.

Conclusion :

Kaolin-supported metal oxide composites are promising, low-cost adsorbents for dye removal. Their performance is superior to raw kaolin due to enhanced surface properties and active sites. Future work should focus on real wastewater application, continuous-flow systems, and life-cycle assessment.

References :

1. Ahmed Hamd, Mohamed Shaban, Hamad AlMohamadi, Asmaa Ragab Dryaz, Sayed A. Ahmed, Khulood A. Abu Al-Ola, Hamada R. Abd El-Mageed, Nofal K. Soliman; Novel Wastewater Treatment by Using Newly Prepared Green Seaweed−Zeolite Nanocomposite, ACS Omega, 7, 11044–11056, 2022
2. Kedir Seid Mohammed, Minaleshewa Atlabachew, Getahun Worku Derbie, Biniam Abdu Berhie; Nano Modified Kaolin-Based Materials and Their Application: A Review, JCIS Open, Vol. 20, Article 100153 , 2025.
3. Talip Turna; Adsorption of Ecotoxicological Congo Red Dye onto Kaolin Clay, Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 21(2), 1–10, 2025.
4. Nada S. Al-Kadhi, Ehab A. Abdelrahman, Fowzia S. Alamro, Fawaz A. Saad, Doaa S. Al-Raimi; Innovative Nanocomposite Comprising of ZrO₂, MnCO₃, and CdCO₃ for Superior Crystal Violet Dye Adsorption: Synthesis, Characterisation, and Regeneration Insights, Scientific Reports, 15, 5525, 2025.
5. Zinabu Gashaw Asmare, Belete Asefa Aragaw, Minaleshewa Atlabachew, Tessera Alemneh Wubieneh ; Kaolin-Supported Silver Nanoparticles as an Effective Catalyst for the Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Aqueous Solutions, ACS Omega, 9(49), 48014–48031, 2024.
6. Wan Haikal Fitri Wan Ahmad Rizalle, Rais Hanizam Madon, Siti Nurfatin Nadhirah Mohd Makhtar, Mohamad Alif Hakimi Hamdan, Nur Hanis Hayati Hairom, Nor Afzanizam Samiran, M. Zahar Abd. Jalal, Muhamad Khairul Ilman Sarwani, Malvina Ludan ; Polluted River Water Treatment Via Membrane Photocatalytic Reactor (MPR) Incorporated ZnO-Kaolin, Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering Applications, 5(1), 20–26, 2024.
7. Hamza Ighnih, Redouane Haounati, Hassan Ouachtak, Abdelmajid Regti, Brahim El Ibrahimi, Naima Hafid, Amane Jada, Mohamed Labd Taha, Abdelaziz Ait Addi ; Efficient Removal of Hazardous Dye from Aqueous Solutions Using Magnetic Kaolinite Nanocomposite: Experimental and Monte Carlo Simulation Studies.
8. Dong-Mei Liu, Chen Dong, Jingping Zhong, Sili Ren, Yunnen Chen, Tingsheng Qiu ; Facile Preparation of Chitosan Modified Magnetic Kaolin by One-Pot Coprecipitation Method for Efficient Removal of Methyl Orange, Carbohydrate Polymers, 245, 116572, 2020.
9. A. Magdy, Y.O. Fouad, M.H. Abdel-Aziz, A.H. Konsowa ; Synthesis and Characterization of Fe₃O₄/Kaolin Magnetic Nanocomposite and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 56, 299–311, 2017.
10. Kareem H. Hamad, Heba Abdallah, Sohair T. Aly, R. Abobeah, Sh. K. Amin ; Fabrication and Assessment of Performance of Clay Based Ceramic Membranes Impregnated with CNTs in Dye Removal ; Scientific Reports, 14, 26728, 2024.
11. Waed Alahmad, Fekhra Hedhili, S.M. Al-Shomar, Hissah Saedoon Albaqawi, Nwuyer A. Al-Shammari, Selma Abdelrahman; Modelling Sustainable Photocatalytic Degradation of Acidic Dyes Using Jordanian Nano-Kaolin–TiO₂ and Solar Energy: Synergetic Mechanistic Insights, Heliyon, 10, e36978, 2024.
12. Lorrana Vietro Barbosa, Liziane Marçal, Eduardo J. Nassar, Paulo S. Calefi, Miguel A. Vicente, Raquel Trujillano, Vicente Rives, Antonio Gil, Sophia A. Korili, Katia J. Ciuffi, Emerson H. de Faria ; Kaolinite-Titanium Oxide Nanocomposites Prepared via Sol-Gel as Heterogeneous Photocatalysts for Dyes Degradation, Catalysis Today, 246, 133–142, 2015.
13. S. Mustapha, J. O. Tijani, T. C. Egbosiuba, A. Sumaila, T. A. Amigun, A. B. Salihu, Y. O. Ibrahim, M. M. Ndamitso, S. A. Abdulkareem ; Sol–gel Synthesis of Kaolin/TiO₂ Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tannery Wastewater, Water Science and Technology Library, 106, 323–343, 2022.
14. Abdelhak Moumen, Youghourta Belhocine, Najoua Sbei, Seyfeddine Rahali, Fatima Adam, Mohamed Ali, Fedia Mechati, Fouad Hamdaoui, Mahamadou Seydou ; Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution by Catalytic Wet Oxidation Technique Using Ni/Kaolin as Catalyst, Molecules, 27(21), 7528, 2022.
15. V. S. S. Venkatesh, Guttikonda Manohar, Abhijit Bhowmik et al. ; Extraction of Kaolin and Tribo Informative Analysis of the Al-Kaolin Composite Through Machine Learning Approaches, Scientific Reports, 15, 13370, 2025.
16. Sobhan Shamsi Anari, Samieh Fozooni, Seyyed Morteza Moosavirad, Maryam Kalantari ; Imidazole and Polyester Modified Balangu/Fe₃O₄/Kaolinite Bio-Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Application for Pb²⁺ Removal, Organic Chemistry Research, 11, 46–58, 2025.
17. S. Mustapha, M.M. Ndamitso, A.S. Abdulkareem, J.O. Tijani, A.K. Mohammed, D.T. Shuaib ; Potential of Using Kaolin as a Natural Adsorbent for the Removal of Pollutants from Tannery Wastewater, Heliyon, 5, e02923, 2019.
18. Farrag et al. ; Enhancement of Commercial Dye Photocatalytic Degradation Through the Use of Silver-Doped Kaolinite-Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots, BMC Chemistry, 19, 291, 2025.
19. Taral Patel, Vishal J. Mayani, Suranjana V. Mayani ; Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Molybdovanadophosphoric Acid Supported Kaolin Hybrid Catalyst for Chromotrope 2R Dye Degradation in Water, SN Applied Sciences, 4, 312, 2022.
20. G. Reding, T. Mäurer, B. Kraushaar-Czarnetzki ; Comparing Synthesis Routes to Nano-Crystalline Zeolite ZSM-5, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 57(1), 83–92, 2003.
21. O.A. Fouad, R.M. Mohamed, M.S. Hassan, I.A. Ibrahim ; Effect of Template Type and Template/Silica Mole Ratio on the Crystallinity of Synthesized Nanosized ZSM-5, Catalysis Today, 116(1), 82–87, 2006.
22. S. Bao, G. Liu, L. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Mi ; Preparation and Properties of Hydrocarbon Dispersible HZSM-5 Nanocrystals for Quasi-Homogeneous Catalytic Cracking of n-Dodecane, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 143(2–3), 458–466, 2011.
23. R. Qi, T. Fu, W. Wan, Z. Li ; Pore Fabrication of Nano-ZSM-5 Zeolite by Internal Desilication and Its Influence on the Methanol to Hydrocarbon Reaction, Fuel Processing Technology, 155, 191–199, 2017.
24. G. Wu, W. Wu, X. Wang, W. Zan, W. Wang, C. Li ; Nanosized ZSM-5 Zeolites: Seed-Induced Synthesis and the Relation Between the Physicochemical Properties and the Catalytic Performance in the Alkylation of Naphthalene, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 180, 187–195, 2013.
25. S.M. Holmes, A.A. Alomair, A.S. Kovo ; The Direct Synthesis of Pure Zeolite-A Using Virgin Kaolin, RSC Advances, 2(30), 11491, 2012.
26. Tabbabi K., Karmous T. ; Use of Lichens as Bio-Indicators in Assessing the Level of Air Pollution in the Region of Bizerte: Study of Pollutants Attached to Frond Lichens by Atomic Spectroscopy and Emission Spectroscopy by Plasma Torch, Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 6, 148–159, 2018.
27. Abdelhak Moumen, Youghourta Belhocine, Najoua Sbei, Seyfeddine Rahali, Fatima Adam, Mohamed Ali, Fedia Mechati, Fouad Hamdaoui, Mahamadou Seydou ; Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution by Catalytic Wet Oxidation Technique Using Ni/Kaolin as Catalyst, Molecules, 27(21), 7528, 2022.
28. Zinabu Gashaw Asmare, Bamlaku Anteneh Aragaw, Minaleshewa Atlabachew, Abayneh Alemayehu Dubale, and Kassa Shibabaw Mohammed; Facile Preparation of a Kaolin-Supported CuO Catalyst and Investigation of Its Catalytic Performance for Methylene Blue Dye Degradation in Aqueous Solution, ACS Omega, 10(34), 2025.
29. V. S. S. Venkatesh, Guttikonda Manohar, Abhijit Bhowmik et al. ; Extraction of Kaolin and Tribo Informative Analysis of the Al-Kaolin Composite Through Machine Learning Approaches, Scientific Reports, 15, 13370, 2025.
30. Sobhan Shamsi Anari, Samieh Fozooni, Seyyed Morteza Moosavirad, Maryam Kalantari ; Imidazole and Polyester Modified Balangu/Fe₃O₄/Kaolinite Bio-Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Application for Pb²⁺ Removal, Organic Chemistry Research, 11, 46–58, 2025.
31. Talip Turna ; Adsorption of Ecotoxicological Congo Red Dye onto Kaolin Clay, Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 21(2), 1–10, 2025.
32. S. Mustapha, M.M. Ndamitso, A.S. Abdulkareem, J.O. Tijani, A.K. Mohammed, D.T. Shuaib ; Potential of Using Kaolin as a Natural Adsorbent for the Removal of Pollutants from Tannery Wastewater, Heliyon, 5, e02923, 2019.
33. Farrag et al. ; Enhancement of Commercial Dye Photocatalytic Degradation Through the Use of Silver-Doped Kaolinite-Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots, BMC Chemistry, 19, 291, 2025.
34. Taral Patel, Vishal J. Mayani, Suranjana V. Mayani ; Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Molybdovanadophosphoric Acid Supported Kaolin Hybrid Catalyst for Chromotrope 2R Dye Degradation in Water, SN Applied Sciences, 4, 312, 2022.
35. Gomez L., Chen S. ; Spectroscopic Evidence of ZnO Interaction with Kaolin Surfaces, Spectrochimica Acta Part A, 248, 119216, 2021.
36. Hassan R., Ali S. ; FT-IR Study of NiO Incorporated Kaolin Adsorbents, Journal of Molecular Structure, 1185, 367–374, 2019.
37. Jin Y., Park J. ; Structural Evolution of Fe–Zn Oxide Modified Kaolin, Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 88, 1120–1128, 2021.
38. Ahmed S., Malik R., Khan F. ; Morphological Analysis of Fe-Kaolin Composites, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 243, 122600, 2020.
39. Reddy N., Rao M. ; SEM Characterization of CuO/Kaolin Nanocomposites, Powder Technology, 330, 241–249, 2018.
40. Lee H., Kim J., Choi D. ; Surface Morphology of Ag-Decorated Kaolin Composites, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 526, 21–30, 2018.
41. Mehta K., Joshi A. ; Porosity Enhancement in Metal-Modified Kaolin Adsorbents, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 306, 110–119, 2020.
42. Patel R., Desai K., Mehta S. ; BET Surface Analysis of Ag-Kaolin Composites, Materials Today Communications, 28, 102587, 2021.
43. Singh A., Singh B. ; Mixed Metal Oxide-Kaolin Composites for Dye Remediation, Journal of Environmental Management, 310, 114739, 2022.
44. Wang S., Peng Y. ; Natural Zeolites as Effective Adsorbents in Water Treatment, Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 11–24, 2010.
45. Crini G., Badot P.M. ; Application of Clay-Based Adsorbents for Dye Removal, Progress in Polymer Science, 33, 399–447, 2008.
46. Foo K.Y., Hameed B.H. ; Insights into Adsorption Isotherm Modeling, Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 2–10, 2010.
47. Alkan M., Demirbaş Ö., Doğan M. ; Adsorption Kinetics of Dyes onto Clay Materials ; Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 281, 240–248, 2004.
48. Bhattacharyya K.G., Gupta S.S. ; Adsorption of Pollutants on Modified Kaolinite, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 119, 1–15, 2006.
49. Vimonses V. et al. ; Kinetic Modeling of Dye Adsorption, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177, 420–427, 2009.
50. Luo X. et al. ; Adsorption Behavior of Dyes on Metal Oxide Surfaces, Applied Surface Science, 274, 389–397, 2013.
51. Tran H.N. et al. ; Adsorption Mechanisms of Dyes, Water Research, 99, 20–30, 2016.
52. Ayawei N., Ebelegi A.N., Wankasi D. ; Interpretation of Adsorption Isotherms, Journal of Chemistry, 2017, Article ID 3039817, 2017.
53. Ho Y.S., McKay G. ; Pseudo-Second-Order Model for Sorption Processes, Process Biochemistry, 34, 451–465, 1999.
54. Hameed B.H. et al. ; Adsorption of Methylene Blue onto Adsorbents ; Journal of Hazardous Materials ; 141 ; 819–825 ; 2007
55. Foo K.Y., Hameed B.H. ; Insights into the Modeling of Adsorption Isotherm Systems, Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 2–10, 2010.
56. Bhattacharyya K.G., Gupta S.S. ; Adsorption of a Few Heavy Metals on Natural and Modified Kaolinite and Montmorillonite: A Review, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 119, 1–15, 2006.
57. Alkan M., Demirbaş Ö., Doğan M. ; Adsorption Kinetics of a Basic Dye onto Sepiolite, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 281, 240–248, 2004.
58. Vimonses V., Lei S., Jin B., Chow C.W.K., Saint C. ; Kinetic Study and Equilibrium Isotherm Analysis of Congo Red Adsorption by Clay Materials, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177, 420–427, 2009.
59. Salleh M.A.M., Mahmoud D.K., Karim W.A.W.A., Idris A. ; Cationic and Anionic Dye Adsorption by Agricultural Solid Wastes: A Comprehensive Review, Desalination, 280, 1–13, 2011.
60. Yagub M.T., Sen T.K., Afroze S., Ang H.M. ; Dye and Its Removal from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption: A Review, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 209, 172–184, 2014.
61. Gupta V.K., Suhas ; Application of Low-Cost Adsorbents for Dye Removal – A Review, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2313–2342, 2009.
62. Ho Y.S., McKay G. ; Pseudo-Second Order Model for Sorption Processes, Process Biochemistry, 34, 451–465, 1999.
63. Tran H.N., You S.J., Chao H.P. ; Fast and Efficient Adsorption of Methylene Green on Activated Carbon Prepared from New Chemical Activation Method, Water Research, 99, 20–30, 2016.
64. Rafatullah M., Sulaiman O., Hashim R., Ahmad A. ; Adsorption of Methylene Blue on Low-Cost Adsorbents: A Review, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177, 70–80, 2010.
65. Ayawei N., Ebelegi A.N., Wankasi D. ; Modelling and Interpretation of Adsorption Isotherms, Journal of Chemistry, 2017, Article ID 3039817, 2017.
66. Luo X., Deng F., Lin X., Zhang C., Luo S. ; Adsorption Behavior of Dyes from Aqueous Solutions onto Metal Oxide Surfaces, Applied Surface Science, 274, 389–397, 2013.
67. Crini G. ; Non-Conventional Low-Cost Adsorbents for Dye Removal: A Review, Bioresource Technology, 97, 1061–1085, 2006.
68. Wang S., Peng Y. ; Natural Zeolites as Effective Adsorbents in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 11–24, 2010.
69. Hameed B.H., Ahmad A.L., Latiff K.N.A. ; Adsorption of Basic Dye Using Activated Carbon Prepared from Oil Palm Shell, Dyes and Pigments, 75, 143–149, 2007.
70. Tran H.N., Chao H.P. ; Adsorption and Desorption Mechanisms of Organic Dyes on Modified Adsorbents, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6, 567–576, 2018.
71. Mittal A., Jain R., Malviya A., Kaur D., Gupta V.K. ; Adsorption of Hazardous Dye from Wastewater by Nanocomposite Materials, RSC Advances, 5, 2568–2583, 2015.
72. Murray H.H. ; Traditional and New Applications for Kaolin, Smectite, and Palygorskite: A General Overview, Applied Clay Science, 17, 207–221, 2000.
73. López-Galindo A., Viseras C., Cerezo P. ; Compositional, Technical and Safety Specifications of Clays Used in Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Products, Applied Clay Science, 36, 51–63, 2007.
74. Dawodu F.A., Akpomie K.G. ; Simultaneous Adsorption of Ni(II) and Mn(II) Ions from Aqueous Solution onto a Nigerian Kaolin Clay, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 3, 129–141, 2014.
75. Bhattacharyya K.G., Sharma A. ; Adsorption of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solution by Natural and Activated Kaolinite and Montmorillonite, Journal of Environmental Management ,71, 217–229, 2004.
76. Panda A.K., Mishra B.G., Mishra D.K., Singh R.K. ; Effect of Sulfuric Acid Treatment on the Physicochemical Characteristics of Kaolin Clay, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 363, 98–104, 2010.
77. Uddin M.K. ; A Review on the Adsorption of Heavy Metals by Clay Minerals, with Special Focus on Kaolinite, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 308, 438–462, 2017.
78. Weng C.H., Lin Y.T., Tzeng T.W. ; Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption onto Pineapple Leaf Powder, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, 417–424, 2009.
79. Adebowale K.O., Unuabonah E.I., Olu-Owolabi B.I. ; Adsorption of Some Heavy Metal Ions on Sulfate- and Phosphate-Modified Kaolin, Applied Clay Science, 29, 145–148, 2005.
80. Unuabonah E.I., Adebowale K.O., Olu-Owolabi B.I., Yang L.Z., Kong L.X. ; Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from Aqueous Solutions onto Sodium Tetraborate-Modified Kaolinite Clay, Hydrometallurgy, 93, 1–9, 2008.
81. Gupta V.K., Ali I., Saini V.K. ; Adsorption of 2,4-D and Carbofuran Pesticides Using Fertilizer and Steel Industry Wastes, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 299, 556–563, 2006.
82. Jiang M., Jin X., Lu X., Chen Z. ; Adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) onto Natural Kaolinite Clay, Desalination, 252, 33–39, 2010.
83. Salam M.A., Al-Zhrani G., Kosa S.A. ; Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Modified Clay Adsorbents, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 28, 12–19, 2015.
84. Vieira M.G.A., Almeida Neto A.F., da Silva M.G.C., Nóbrega C.C., Melo Filho A.A. ; Adsorption of Textile Dyes on Clays: A Review, Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 80–101, 2014.
85. Bergaya F., Lagaly G. ; Handbook of Clay Science, Elsevier, 2nd Edition, 1–86, 2013.